Skip to content

chore: Adapt to apify-client v3 [WIP] #719

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
vdusek wants to merge 17 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

chore: Adapt to apify-client v3 [WIP] #719

vdusek wants to merge 17 commits into from

Conversation

@vdusek
Copy link
Contributor

@vdusek vdusek commented Dec 23, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Description

Issues

Testing

  • The existing SDK tests pass with apify-python-client v3.

@vdusek vdusek self-assigned this Dec 23, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 130th sprint - Tooling team milestone Dec 23, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team. tested Temporary label used only programatically for some analytics. labels Dec 23, 2025
@vdusek vdusek added the adhoc Ad-hoc unplanned task added during the sprint. label Dec 23, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 23, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 50.80645% with 61 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 67.98%. Comparing base (8a78b6f) to head (e094d6a).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...age_clients/_apify/_request_queue_single_client.py 5.88% 16 Missing ⚠️
...age_clients/_apify/_request_queue_shared_client.py 7.14% 13 Missing ⚠️
src/apify/_actor.py 61.53% 10 Missing ⚠️
...fy/storage_clients/_apify/_request_queue_client.py 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
.../storage_clients/_apify/_key_value_store_client.py 20.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
...rc/apify/storage_clients/_apify/_dataset_client.py 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
...c/apify/storage_clients/_apify/_alias_resolving.py 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...ify/storage_clients/_apify/_api_client_creation.py 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
src/apify/storage_clients/_apify/_models.py 60.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
src/apify/storage_clients/_apify/_utils.py 50.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
... and 1 more

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (8a78b6f) and HEAD (e094d6a). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE
Flag BASE (8a78b6f) HEAD (e094d6a)
integration 1 0
Additional details and impacted files 
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #719       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   81.91%   67.98%   -13.94%     
===========================================
  Files          46       46               
  Lines        2693     2758       +65     
===========================================
- Hits         2206     1875      -331     
- Misses        487      883      +396
Flag Coverage Δ
integration ?
unit 67.98% <50.80%> (-0.09%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@vdusek vdusek force-pushed the adapt-to-apify-client-v3 branch from a45f20c to 4270cb9 Compare January 2, 2026 12:45
@vdusek vdusek mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2026
Draft
@vdusek vdusek force-pushed the adapt-to-apify-client-v3 branch from c26dd9f to 7d6dbb1 Compare January 9, 2026 14:27
@vdusek vdusek force-pushed the adapt-to-apify-client-v3 branch 3 times, most recently from 3e14e50 to 12a29ae Compare January 23, 2026 14:25
@vdusek vdusek force-pushed the adapt-to-apify-client-v3 branch from ba4d354 to e094d6a Compare January 27, 2026 14:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

@vdusek vdusek

Labels

adhoc Ad-hoc unplanned task added during the sprint. t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team. tested Temporary label used only programatically for some analytics.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

130th sprint - Tooling team

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Adapt to typed apify-client-python

2 participants

@vdusek